Publish Date
Jan 08, 2025
Factory of the Future initiatives have been a topic of discussion for over a decade and refer to a transformation within the manufacturing industry by adopting digital technologies to improve process performance. However, when manufacturing leaders are tasked with driving long-term, sustainable impacts to the bottom line, their first thought is not typically commissioning a digital twin, developing AI-enabled procurement processes or building a “lights out” greenfield factory. Due to idealistic mindsets around the Factory of the Future, these initiatives, often referred to as “industry 4.0 initiatives,” are perceived as fantasy as opposed to more traditional, practical approaches to improving business performance. This perception may influence manufacturing executives as they navigate improvements, continuously balancing high-impact, long-term projects against quick wins while ensuring sustained success and controlled capital expenditure (CapEx).
What would happen if two projects appeared equal on the surface — both with high return on investment (ROI), short payback and operationally controllable inputs — but one was a stepping stone toward the Factory of the Future and the other was not? Would leadership recognize and prioritize accordingly? If the former was outside the leadership’s personal experience, would it get dismissed? This concern emphasizes the need for leaders to be informed on how to translate immediate opportunities into the beginnings of industry 4.0 initiatives to future proof the business from an increasingly challenging labor market, volatile supply chains and changing demand patterns.
https://www.alvarezandmarsal.com/insights/factory-future-paving-way-industry-40